 |
"Their View" Archives:
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
What They Thought August 29, 2004 R.A.
Hawkins Click here for columnist bios |
||||||||||
R.A.
Hawkins In last week's column, I made the understandable mistake of saying it was the Massachusetts Governor that had come out of the closet. Actually, it was the New Jersey Governor that did it. I will let the reader guess as to whether it was a mistake or a jab. The Freudian slip did have a particularly useful side to it, however. It gave me something to write about again. The DNC managed to have their little convention and nobody bothered them in the least. Now that it is time for the GOP to have their convention, the radical left thinks they have a mission. I want all of those thankless twits to know they have my full support in this new mission which they have managed to fabricate out of the very thin air that resides between their ears. For years, we in the west have been saved from ourselves by the Communists. They have apparently realized that to be the case, and are no longer being overt in their hostility towards the west. They are playing it a lot closer these days. For those of you who don't understand what I mean by saved from ourselves, here it is: In the west, we tend to want to just have fun and shop. When we get mad, we go shopping ten minutes after we forget what upset us. We have a foppish and decadent streak to us that the enemy has finally recognized. If they do not do anything to push the patriot button, we will do ourselves in, much like Rome did as she drowned herself in her own excesses. To those of you living in San Francisco, you may want to choose Greece as your point of reference. In order to keep from pushing the patriot button, the enemy has chosen certain surrogates to do their dirty work for them. By that, I mean Iraq (Oooops! So sorry, Putin) and now Iran. This allows them to console us when bad things happen to us and to look far more genuine. The funny thing about dealing with terrorist states on friendly terms (Kerry's foreign policy idea) is that eventually it comes back at you. Russia seems to have just gotten a little reminder in that area. The epicenter for the current spate of radical Islam was Afghanistan. It was something that grew in response to their invasion. I remember quite well that day they invaded them. President Carter wanted to show the East that we were a peace loving people and so he cancelled the B1 bomber program. The Politburo members broke out the caviar and the AK-47s. It was their goodwill gesture, and it reminds me of the kind of behavior we are about to see from the leftists here. No act of goodwill or civility goes unpunished. I am looking forward to the riots and protests we are about to be treated to. Yes, go ahead and show this country what you really are. Take off your little smiley face masks and get down to business. Let America know that you're not a bunch of harmless idiots. I think the sad part is that those who will commit these stupid acts will do what they do best. They will blame society and claim victimhood. It is their hallmark, and destruction is their modus operandi. As you gather on the streets to show what you're really made of, I want all of you little Bolshevik twits to know I hope you accomplish your mission. I am counting on you to show your ample rear ends. I want you to do your dead level best to pull off a Paul Wellstone funeral for us. I want America to see what a bunch of miscreants you really are. Yes, riot against Capitalism. Riot against the freeing of the Iraqi people. Carry your pro-terrorist placards. Break windows and loot. Throw rocks at authority. Just go nuts and have at it. The sad part is that nobody will be there to grease their tank treads on you. You know that, and you act the way you do because you know it's safe to do so. Yes, I'm laughing at you. I still remember every gathering you have had in the last few years. You didn't know it, but I did...they were all practice runs for this one. Show us what you are, and burn, baby, burn. What a bunch of clueless clowns. R.A. Hawkins Web Site Contact Back to Top |
||||||||||
Until recently, they've been buried under facades of patriotism and wrapped in the American flag. The "WMD's" have performed various roles; some have played the supportive position to presidential candidates, and others starred as concerned state representatives and caring attorney generals. The "WMD's" have been on a constant driven quest to destroy all we hold dear here in America, and finally they've been exposed. Will we awaken and grasp who these "WMD's" are? Intelligence gatherers have been slowly building their case against these "Women of Mass Destruction." It has taken awhile, but they wanted to make sure all angles of possible escape from what they represent were fully established. The ultimate missile that finalized the case for these "WMD's" was Theresa Heinz Kerry. Her quick temper and the inability to keep her mouth shut has her spiteful lips exposing her mass destructive behaviors rapidly. Statements such as, "Shove it!" launched at a reporter and, "Four more years of hell," blasted like poison gas at Bush supporters who showed up at a Kerry rally reveal she's running for a socialistic partnership with her husband. All along, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Janet Reno and other far-left political women were known to be a threat to freedom, but now we can add unequivocally to this list Tyrant 'testa' Theresa Heinz Kerry. Ms. Heinz Kerry is doing a great job in finishing the exposure of these radical socialistic women. I don't know if she and her husband, John Kerry, discussed her co-presidency, but it would appear they have, or John Kerry is whipped and his wife runs the ship.(Would that explain why John Kerry felt the need to recreate the "I'm king of the world" scenario from Titanic the other night while on a ferry crossing Lake Michigan? John, buddy, you're on a ship that sinks…) With over 57 Heinz company varieties to choose from, and major outsourcing of American jobs she's affiliated with, Ms. Heinz Kerry — with her financial attachments to the Heinz Company — has the money to be one of the most dangerous members of the "WMD" club. Between 1995-2001, Ms. Heinz-Kerry gave more than $4 million to an organization called the Tides Foundation. The Tides Foundation supports numerous antiwar groups, including Ramsey Clark's International Action Center. Clark was acknowledged to have offered to defend Saddam Hussein when he's tried. They support the Democratic Justice Fund, a joint venture of the Tides Foundation and billionaire George Soros (MoveOn.org). The Democratic Justice Fund seeks to ease restrictions on Muslim immigration from "terrorist" states. They support the Council for American-Islamic Relations whose leaders are known to have pronounced ties to the terrorist group, Hamas. One of their attorneys, Lynne Stewart, has been arrested for helping a client, Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, converse with terror cells in Egypt. He's the convicted mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. They support the "Barrio Warriors" (a radical Hispanic group) whose primary goal is to return all of Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas to Mexico. As you can see, any WMD with mucho dinero can be a great threat to our Republic. We need to educate ourselves and see the real Teresa Heinz Kerry and her comrades of WMD's. If we'll truly open our eyes and ears, we'll not agree with their positions as ultra-rich bombshells of the radical left. Isn't it odd how many of the wealthy lean left? Ever wonder why? Why are they for socialized health care and pro-Planned Parenthood? Why are they for big government and against tax cuts? John Kerry has chosen his "Evita," but we don’t desire a co-presidency in our country. America wants to know what the candidates running believe, think, and plan. We aren't interested in your spouse's ideals or overly dramatic speeches, unless they end up being the ones who are holding the "chain" of command and you are just the face out front we see. John Kerry, America still doesn’t know who or what you are, except that you served in Vietnam. But America has seen one thing clearly: your wife is a "WMD." and we've reason to be fearful of those who believe like her. Candidates, if your spouse isn't the one running for office, strap their mouths shut and quit letting your "loose cannons" fire at will. Theresa is not a co-candidate, just as Hillary wasn’t throughout the Bill Clinton years. Our system was designed to have a president and vice president. Running for office is clearly understandable. America doesn’t have a husband/wife president/co-president option, and thank goodness we don't. The "Women of Mass Destruction" are here espousing, lobbying, and dropping their ideals of destroying America and her freedoms. These women are dangerous and desire a socialistic America. The "WMD's" we know are amongst us; they've been found. Time is quickly ticking by. How will we dismantle the warheads and cut their red wires before the detention and annihilation of our Republic occurs? Kerry L. Marsala Web Site Contact Back to Top |
||||||||||
I
should probably devote this column to New Jersey Gov. Jim McGreevey’s
recent announcement that he will step
down for having had a homosexual affair—that seems to be the
“it” story of the moment. But I don’t think I’m going to write about
that. For one thing, I’m behind the curve. I was out of the country—and
trying to avoid all forms of news—when the announcement came (and
you’ve probably read more than enough about it by now). I do think it’s
ironic, though, that this happened the same week I was on my honeymoon.
Why? Because as
I said back in March, the fact that I
needed the State of New Jersey’s permission to get married means
I basically married both McGreevey and my wife. See? I told
you there was something flimsy about him. Thank God I moved to
Pennsylvania. Slap a mustache and glasses on Ed Rendell, I could probably
learn to love him in that Wilford-Brimley-grandfather-figure sort of
way. But that’s neither here nor there.
Anyway, that’s not what I want to talk about today. No. Because, quite frankly, I don’t care if McGreevey’s a homosexual. It affects me about as much as it seems to be affecting his wife—which is to say it doesn’t affect me at all. The only thing I’m bothered by is the idea that the press should leave him alone and “let him do his job” until he officially moves out of Drumthwacket Mansion in November. If “doing his job” includes making unqualified appointments—on homeland security, no less—in return for sexual favors, I say hound him till the Jersey cows come home. But I don’t want to talk about that today, either. What I want to talk about is this: I am a Castro supporter. Let me explain. I am not, in the
literal sense, a fan of Fidel. I have no sympathies for communist despots.
I am a freedom-loving libertarian-type of person; I am not a team player,
and I abhor central planning. But I am, by conventional wisdom,
a Castro supporter. I came to this conclusion when I returned to the
States from Aruba last week with a single Cuban cigar. They’re easy
to buy in Aruba, you know—like buying a box of Blueberry Morning.
The one I brought home was a $25 Cohiba. I smuggled it into the country
by wrapping it in a hotel washcloth and stuffing it in between toothpaste
and hairspray. True. But I went ahead and helped Castro’s economy in some small, incalculable way nonetheless. So why would I do this? Why would I make a purchase the equivalent of wearing a Che Guevara t-shirt? Well, the best way to explain it is to share with you an anecdote. During my trip, an Aruban asked me why it was, exactly, that Americans weren’t allowed to bring Cuban cigars through U.S. customs. “Because we live in a dictatorship,” I told him, unironically. My wife quickly shot back, “No, it’s because Cubans live in a dictatorship.” In fact, I think we were both right. America’s Cuban embargo is based on the [insane] belief that somehow, if we just stop buying Cuban products, Castro will go away. And the ends are desirable, of course; Castro sucks as a person. But if you ask me, breaking the locks off my luggage looking for smokes—as the Transportation Security Administration did—makes our government no better than his. And so I have three reasons for opposing the embargo. First of all, it’s been around since 1961. That’s a pretty long time. If it was going to work, you have to assume it would’ve worked by now. But it hasn’t. Castro’s still in power. He’s the world’s longest reigning dictator. Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush I, and Clinton have all come and gone since he first came to power. The man’s even outlasted the entire combined run of M*A*S*H, Seinfeld, and Cheers. If the embargo was meant to isolate Cuba and flatten its communist framework, it’s failed. (They say insanity is using the same method over and over, expecting different results. That’s a good way of looking at this situation. It’s also why I’m not looking forward to the Joey spin-off of Friends.) Secondly, what’s the knock on communism? That it necessarily strangles the free market? Well, if you’re against that, I’m with you all the way. But forbidding the purchase of Cuban cigars is a funny way of striking a blow for free market economics. In a free market, consumer demand writes the rules. So if America’s interested in leading the free world—an oxymoronic concept, but work with me here—we would do well to lead by example instead of by force and protectionist tactics. Open the market. Lift the restrictions. Let freedom ring, and people will hear it. That’s a money-back guarantee. Finally, the third reason I disagree with the embargo is because it is dumb. I love a good stogie, but I’m no connoisseur. From what I can tell, though—after visiting Aruba—Cuban cigars aren’t that much better than others. They’re better; just not that much. But you’d never know this based on the way Americans savor them. Here, they’re seen as deliciously wicked forbidden fruit. And that’s just the thing: The Cubans I smoked in Aruba weren’t more enjoyable because they were better; they were more enjoyable because I wasn’t supposed to be enjoying them. It was an act of civil disobedience, and this gave me great satisfaction. Smoking a Cuban was like smoking the plank in Big Brother’s eye. It served him right. And it tasted good. So if, by conventional wisdom, this makes me a Castro supporter—so be it. Guilty as charged. If I’m going to give up some freedoms, it’s going to be to my wife. She’s at least earned it. Our government—under the reigns of such men as Jim McGreevey, whose actions are despicable no matter who the hell he sleeps with—has not. Viva la revolucion. Jonathan David Morris Web Site Contact Back to Top |
||||||||||
More than 30 per cent of people are more depressed during the winter according to research into the impact of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) on mental health. After suffering through some of the most adverse weather in decades, no doubt that many are downhearted. But most of us will bounce back, it is only a temporary feeling. Surely, this despair is not the sign of a permanent disorder! Only those who profess crazed political thought need to fear. This is a case study in one such individual, who dared to expound such ideas and became a perennial patient in the process.. Most of this account is taken directly from the source, a political prisoner Stephen Ames, locked up in a Pennsylvania Mental Hospital, an enemy of the state, for steadfastly proclaiming these heretical ideas. You be the judge as to his sanity . . . dissecting the NWO would be a good start:
The purpose of this story is to illustrate that the progression of uncovering political relationships is a very dangerous venture. You are urged to read the entire series of essays. This segment was selected because it contains citations to review. The significance of Mr Ames' conclusions would not be considered by most people, less will understand them, and even fewer will accept them to be correct. However, the underlying record of systemic enslavement is the universal sage of all human history. Is it insane to connect the dots, or is the offense in speaking about all the relationships? The study on obedience to authority, mentioned in this source account, carried out by Stanely Milgram, speaks directly to this question. The “blues” of SAD are nothing compared to the hollow emptiness of grasping the totality of the fraud that has been executed upon mankind. This awareness does not make one sick, it only jolts you to the reality that one is prostrated under the rule of a false system. The power resides in the perpetrators, but the righteousness belong to the people who have the courage to accept the truth. Those who share in the audacity to challenge the scheme of deceit, risk similar confinement as “an enemy of the state”. But are they insane? Are such people demented and should they be institutionalized to protect society from such heterodoxy? Or is mental health defined by the ultimate Sanity Diagnostic Quiz? If less than a third are despondent because of the winter weather, the overwhelming vast majority are medicated on the most destructive drug of them all - obedience to the STATE. A recent report by the mental health charity - Mind, suggests getting outside as much as possible to make the best use of the available daylight. But when people like Stephen Ames sheds the spotlight on the forbidden relationships, they are labeled insane. The psychotic and deranged are those who refuse to confront the servitude scheme, that the sociopaths have designed and operate. Is this the kind of future that will behold us? It will be unless there is an awakening that the biggest lie of all is the one that most people live. DENIAL that the elites that rule - do so through a bogus legal system, a counterfeit version of capitalism and a command and control system - provides the screen to deflect the rays of real illumination. We are all living in an asylum, a prison that grows each day, named the NWO. So tell me, is Stephen Ames nuts or is he being kept in a sanitarium run by the criminally insane? SARTRE Web Site Contact Back to Top |
||||||||||
©2004 by their respective authors. Reprinted by permission. |
||||||||||
|
news | constitution | bill of rights | our view | your view | their view awards to win | awards we've won | resources | goodie shoppe our mission | about us | contact us | privacy policy | site map | home This page last updated on Sunday, September 5, 2004 12:35 PM Optimized for Microsoft Internet Explorer |
||||||||||
|
site content ©2002-2004 site design by |
||||||||||
